Last I checked when we were building here, I'm not sure Pathscale supports -O3. IIRC, O2 is the max supported value, though it has been awhile since I played with it.

Have you checked the man page for it?

It could also be something in the VampirTrace code since that is where you are failing. That is a contributed code - not part of OMPI itself - so we would have to check with those developers.


On May 14, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Åke Sandgren wrote:

On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 13:35 -0700, Joshua Bernstein wrote:
Greetings All,

I'm trying to build OpenMPI 1.3.2 with the Pathscale compiler, version 3.2. A bit of the way through the build the compiler dies with what it things is a bad optimization. Has anybody else seen this, or know a work around for it? I'm going to take it up with Pathscale of course, but I thought I'd throw it out here:

---SNIP---
/opt/pathscale/bin/pathCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../ extlib/otf/otflib -I../../extlib/otf/otflib -I../../vtlib/ -I../../vtlib - D_GNU_SOURCE -mp -DVT_OMP -O3 -DNDEBUG -finline-functions -pthread -MT vtfilter- vt_tracefilter.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/vtfilter-vt_tracefilter.Tpo -c -o vtfilter- vt_tracefilter.o
`test -f 'vt_tracefilter.cc' || echo './'`vt_tracefilter.cc
Signal: Segmentation fault in Global Optimization -- Dead Store Elimination phase. Error: Signal Segmentation fault in phase Global Optimization -- Dead Store
Elimination -- processing aborted
*** Internal stack backtrace:
pathCC INTERNAL ERROR: /opt/pathscale/lib/3.2/be died due to signal 4

Haven't seen it. But I'm only using -O2 when building openmpi.
Report it quickly, if we're lucky they might get a fix into the 3.3
release that is due out very soon. (I just got the beta yesterday)

--
Ake Sandgren, HPC2N, Umea University, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
Internet: a...@hpc2n.umu.se   Phone: +46 90 7866134 Fax: +46 90 7866126
Mobile: +46 70 7716134 WWW: http://www.hpc2n.umu.se

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


Reply via email to