Immediately Sir !!! :) Thanks again Ralph
Geoffroy > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:45:39 -0600 > From: Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ?? > To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org> > Message-ID: > <71d2d8cc0904300545v61a42fe1k50086d2704d0f...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I believe this is fixed now in our development trunk - you can download any > tarball starting from last night and give it a try, if you like. Any > feedback would be appreciated. > > Ralph > > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > > Ah now, I didn't say it -worked-, did I? :-) > > Clearly a bug exists in the program. I'll try to take a look at it (if > Lenny > doesn't get to it first), but it won't be until later in the week. > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote: > > I agree with you Ralph , and that 's what I expect from openmpi but my > second example shows that it's not working > > cat hostfile.0 > r011n002 slots=4 > r011n003 slots=4 > > cat rankfile.0 > rank 0=r011n002 slot=0 > rank 1=r011n003 slot=1 > > mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -n 1 hostname > ### CRASHED > > > > Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankfile.0) > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > rmaps_rank_file.c at line 404 > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 87 > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 77 > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > plm_rsh_module.c at line 985 > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1 while > > attempting to > > > launch so we are aborting. > > > > > > There may be more information reported by the environment (see > > above). > > > > > > This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed > > shared > > > libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to > > have the > > > location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will > > > automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > orterun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the > > process > > > that caused that situation. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > orterun: clean termination accomplished > > > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:55:58 -0600 > From: Ralph Castain <r...@lanl.gov> > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ?? > To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org> > Message-ID: <f6290ada-a196-43f0-a853-cbcb802d8...@lanl.gov> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; > DelSp="yes" > > The rankfile cuts across the entire job - it isn't applied on an > app_context basis. So the ranks in your rankfile must correspond to > the eventual rank of each process in the cmd line. > > Unfortunately, that means you have to count ranks. In your case, you > only have four, so that makes life easier. Your rankfile would look > something like this: > > rank 0=r001n001 slot=0 > rank 1=r001n002 slot=1 > rank 2=r001n001 slot=1 > rank 3=r001n002 slot=2 > > HTH > Ralph > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I agree that my examples are not very clear. What I want to do is to > > launch a multiexes application (masters-slaves) and benefit from the > > processor affinity. > > Could you show me how to convert this command , using -rf option > > (whatever the affinity is) > > > > mpirun -n 1 -host r001n001 master.x options1 : -n 1 -host r001n002 > > master.x options2 : -n 1 -host r001n001 slave.x options3 : -n 1 - > > host r001n002 slave.x options4 > > > > Thanks for your help > > > > Geoffroy > > > > > > > > > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:26:35 +0300 > > From: Lenny Verkhovsky <lenny.verkhov...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ?? > > To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org> > > Message-ID: > > <453d39990904120826t2e1d1d33l7bb1fe3de65b5...@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Hi, > > > > The first "crash" is OK, since your rankfile has ranks 0 and 1 > > defined, > > while n=1, which means only rank 0 is present and can be allocated. > > > > NP must be >= the largest rank in rankfile. > > > > What exactly are you trying to do ? > > > > I tried to recreate your seqv but all I got was > > > > ~/work/svn/ompi/trunk/build_x86-64/install/bin/mpirun --hostfile > > hostfile.0 > > -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -rf rankfile.1 -n 1 hostname > > [witch19:30798] mca: base: component_find: paffinity > > "mca_paffinity_linux" > > uses an MCA interface that is not recognized (component MCA v1.0.0 != > > supported MCA v2.0.0) -- ignored > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > It looks like opal_init failed for some reason; your parallel > > process is > > likely to abort. There are many reasons that a parallel process can > > fail during opal_init; some of which are due to configuration or > > environment problems. This failure appears to be an internal failure; > > here's some additional information (which may only be relevant to an > > Open MPI developer): > > > > opal_carto_base_select failed > > --> Returned value -13 instead of OPAL_SUCCESS > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [witch19:30798] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file > > ../../orte/runtime/orte_init.c at line 78 > > [witch19:30798] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file > > ../../orte/orted/orted_main.c at line 344 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > A daemon (pid 11629) died unexpectedly with status 243 while > > attempting > > to launch so we are aborting. > > > > There may be more information reported by the environment (see above). > > > > This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed > > shared > > libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to > > have the > > location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will > > automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the process > > that caused that situation. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > mpirun: clean termination accomplished > > > > > > Lenny. > > > > > > On 4/10/09, Geoffroy Pignot <geopig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > I am currently testing the process affinity capabilities of > > openmpi and I > > > would like to know if the rankfile behaviour I will describe below > > is normal > > > or not ? > > > > > > cat hostfile.0 > > > r011n002 slots=4 > > > r011n003 slots=4 > > > > > > cat rankfile.0 > > > rank 0=r011n002 slot=0 > > > rank 1=r011n003 slot=1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > ################################################################################## > > > > > > mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 2 hostname ### OK > > > r011n002 > > > r011n003 > > > > > > > > > > > > > ################################################################################## > > > but > > > mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -n 1 > > hostname > > > ### CRASHED > > > * > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankfile.0) > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > rmaps_rank_file.c at line 404 > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 87 > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 77 > > > [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in file > > > plm_rsh_module.c at line 985 > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1 while > > attempting to > > > launch so we are aborting. > > > > > > There may be more information reported by the environment (see > > above). > > > > > > This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed > > shared > > > libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to > > have the > > > location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will > > > automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > orterun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the > > process > > > that caused that situation. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > orterun: clean termination accomplished > > > * > > > It seems that the rankfile option is not propagted to the second > > command > > > line ; there is no global understanding of the ranking inside a > > mpirun > > > command. > > > > > > > > > > > > > ################################################################################## > > > > > > Assuming that , I tried to provide a rankfile to each command line: > > > > > > cat rankfile.0 > > > rank 0=r011n002 slot=0 > > > > > > cat rankfile.1 > > > rank 0=r011n003 slot=1 > > > > > > mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -rf > > rankfile.1 > > > -n 1 hostname ### CRASHED > > > *[r011n002:28778] *** Process received signal *** > > > [r011n002:28778] Signal: Segmentation fault (11) > > > [r011n002:28778] Signal code: Address not mapped (1) > > > [r011n002:28778] Failing at address: 0x34 > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 0] [0xffffe600] > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 1] > > > /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/libopen-rte.so. > > 0(orte_odls_base_default_get_add_procs_data+0x55d) > > > [0x5557decd] > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 2] > > > /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/libopen-rte.so. > > 0(orte_plm_base_launch_apps+0x117) > > > [0x555842a7] > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 3] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/openmpi/ > > mca_plm_rsh.so > > > [0x556098c0] > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 4] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun > > [0x804aa27] > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 5] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun > > [0x804a022] > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 6] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) > > [0x9f1dec] > > > [r011n002:28778] [ 7] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun > > [0x8049f71] > > > [r011n002:28778] *** End of error message *** > > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)* > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope that I've found a bug because it would be very important > > for me to > > > have this kind of capabiliy . > > > Launch a multiexe mpirun command line and be able to bind my exes > > and > > > sockets together. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your help > > > > > > Geoffroy > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > us...@open-mpi.org > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > -------------- next part -------------- > HTML attachment scrubbed and removed > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > End of users Digest, Vol 1202, Issue 2 > ************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > -------------- next part -------------- > HTML attachment scrubbed and removed > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > End of users Digest, Vol 1218, Issue 2 > ************************************** >
