Prentice Bisbal wrote: > Ethan, > > I agree with Doug. Did you try to build for 64-bit in the same > directory? If so, you need to do a 'make clean' or 'make distclean' > before compiling for 32-bit. > > Even if you didn't try to compile for 64-bit yourself, try doing 'make > clean' or 'make distclean'. ;) >
I should add that I had a similar problem only a couple of weeks ago with a different piece of software. The .o files were of type "Mach-0". The developer did his developing on a Mac, and the tarball contained the .o files from his own builds. He didn't have a 'make clean' or 'make distclean' in his Makefile, so I had to resort to find . -name \*.o -exec rm \{\} \; which fixed the problem. -- Prentice