At this time, we are not using non-temporal stores for shared memory
operations.
On Aug 13, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Ron Brightwell wrote:
[...]
MPICH2 manages to get about 5GB/s in shared memory performance on the
Xeon 5420 system.
Does the sm btl use a memcpy with non-temporal stores like MPICH2?
This can be a big win for bandwidth benchmarks that don't actually
touch their receive buffers at all...
-Ron
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems