At this time, we are not using non-temporal stores for shared memory operations.

On Aug 13, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Ron Brightwell wrote:

[...]

MPICH2 manages to get about 5GB/s in shared memory performance on the
Xeon 5420 system.

Does the sm btl use a memcpy with non-temporal stores like MPICH2?
This can be a big win for bandwidth benchmarks that don't actually
touch their receive buffers at all...

-Ron


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems

Reply via email to