On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 15:28 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On > > > > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 09:33 +0100, Åke Sandgren wrote: > > > On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 21:27 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: > > > > > > Run an nm on opal/mca/memory/ptmalloc2/.libs/malloc.o and check if > > > malloc is defined in there. > > > > > > This seems to be the problem i have when compiling with pathscale. > > > It removes the malloc (public_mALLOc) function from the objectfile but > > > leaves the free (public_fREe) in there, resulting in malloc/free > > > mismatch. > > > > For pathscale the solution for me was to add -fno-builtin. > > Now ompi_info doesn't segfault anymore. > > > > Check if the intel 10 has something similar. > > Below is the nm output. The no builtin compiler option you mentioned above > seems to belong to gcc. I have compiled openmpi-1.2.4 with the gcc-4.1.2 > suite without problems.
Ok, it was a long short anyway. -- Ake Sandgren, HPC2N, Umea University, S-90187 Umea, Sweden Internet: a...@hpc2n.umu.se Phone: +46 90 7866134 Fax: +46 90 7866126 Mobile: +46 70 7716134 WWW: http://www.hpc2n.umu.se
