Hi! Now I discover that I can actually use tcpdump to capture tcp packets and use wireshark (the successor of ethereal) for post-capture analysis, where I could use the filter:
not (tcp.port <= 1024) and not nfs to filter non-related traffics However is there a better way I can filter the traffic and also does TCP use a special range of ports which I can look for? On 5/19/07, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:53:21PM -0400, George Bosilca wrote: [bind BTL/TCP+OOB to specific port] > As the linux kernel need some time before completely cleaning up the > socket, this approach can lead to many problems. Absolutely. My propose cannot be consired useful for productive environments. As you've already mentioned, it wouldn't be possible to run more than one process per node. I see two additional approaches: let the BTL component write its listening output to stdout (or a file) and collect these information from every participating node. This is more or less a very reduced version of WANT_PEER_DUMP. The second option would dump the corresponding GPR entries, e.g. on rank 0. I'm thinking of btl_tcp_proc.c:111, somewhere after mca_pml_base_modex_recv(). In line 144, we iterate over each received address. It shouldn't be too hard for "Code Master" to write the ports into a file. -- Cluster and Metacomputing Working Group Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany private: http://adi.thur.de _______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
