On 26.10.2006, at 23:12, Ralph H Castain wrote:
If you wouldn't mind, could you try it again after applying the
attached
patch? This looks like a problem we encountered on another release
where
something in the runtime didn't get initialized early enough. It
only shows
up in certain circumstances, but this seems to fix it.
Thank you for the quick reply, but the patch did not help matters.
I'm currently in the process of compiling a current gcc as I am not
sure how far Apple's rather old gcc 4.01 derivative can be trusted.
Daniel.
