Yup -- definitely a bug.
For all those who care, followups will be here:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/89
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Brian W. Barrett
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:11 PM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] F90 interfaces again
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Michael Kluskens wrote:
>
> > call MPI_WAITALL(3,sp_request,MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE,ier)
> > 1
> > Error: Generic subroutine 'mpi_waitall' at (1) is not
> consistent with
> > a specific subroutine interface
> >
> > Issue, 3rd argument of MPI_WAITALL expects an integer array
> normally,
> > but this constant is permitted by the standard.
> >
> > This is with OpenMPI 1.2a1r10186, I can check the details of the
> > scripts and generated files next week for whatever is the latest
> > version. But odds are this has not been spotted.
>
> Thanks for the bug report -- it does look like this is an
> issue we haven't
> dealt with yet. I've filed a bug in our tracking system on
> the issue, and
> hopefully Jeff will be able to take a look in the near future.
>
> I'm pretty sure this will also be a problem for TESTALL,
> WAITSOME, and
> WAITANY.
>
> Brian
>
> --
> Brian Barrett
> Graduate Student, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University
> http://www.osl.iu.edu/~brbarret/
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
