Thanks; this workaround does allow it to complete its run.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:19:54 -0600, Galen M. Shipman <gship...@lanl.gov> wrote:
Correction: HPL_NO_DATATYPE should be: HPL_NO_MPI_DATATYPE. - Galen On Oct 25, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Galen M. Shipman wrote:Hi Troy, Sorry for the delay, I am now able to reproduce this behavior when I do not specify HPL_NO_DATATYPE. If I do specify HPL_NO_DATATYPE the run completes. We will be looking into this now. Thanks, Galen