On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 06:47:41AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Regardless of which way you choose, your statement "No internals have > to change" is inaccurate. At a minimum, *EVERY* MPI API function in > somebody's implementation will have to change.
That's what I call the interface, yes. It's a similar size effort to creating an F77 interface in an MPI implementation. We've agreed on this several times already; I'm not sure why we need to agree on it again, or why the exact definition of the word "internals" is so important. > I guess I don't understand your reluctance to accept a MorphMPI-like > solution: You have repeated your original MorphMPI attributes. I responded to them, and I don't see any sign that you've read my response. This is not the way discussions are usually held. -- greg
