On 29 June 2015 at 21:51, Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us> wrote: [...] > And, I object to the maintainers assuming that everybody wants color instead > of making it an option. (That is, putting the alias in .bashrc, possibly > commented by default instead of hiding it in /etc/bashrc where most users > would be afraid to make changes, and it gets overwritten with every update.)
The `ls` color alias comes from /etc/profile.d/colorls.sh; which is marked as a config(noreplace) file in the rpm spec: $ rpm -qc coreutils /etc/DIR_COLORS /etc/DIR_COLORS.256color /etc/DIR_COLORS.lightbgcolor /etc/profile.d/colorls.csh /etc/profile.d/colorls.sh which means that if you edit /etc/profile.d/colorls.sh your changes will be preserved even after updating the coreutils package (the /etc/profile.d/colorls.sh file from the new package will be installed with an .rpmnew extension). The same goes for grep. -- Ahmad Samir -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
