On 04/30/15 04:52, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 04:27 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 04/28/2015 01:19 PM, foxec...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On my laptop the file exists but it is zero bytes in length
>> I just checked again and got a response of 0, so I probably typoed the
>> first time.
> My Dell Laptop gives a 0, it has an Intel video chipset.
>
> Both of my desktop systems have nVidia chipsets in them, and both run
> different versions of the nVidia proprietary drivers. They return 4099
> and 12289.
>
And, FWIW, here are the meanings for the various bits....
[egreshko@meimei tainted]$ ./tainted -i
[bit] [bit value] [description]
0 1 A module with a non-GPL license has been loaded, this
includes modules with no license.
Set by modutils >= 2.4.9 and module-init-tools
1 2 A module was force loaded by insmod -f
2 4 Unsafe SMP processors: SMP with CPUs not designed for SMP
3 8 A module was forcibly unloaded from the system by rmmod -f
4 16 A hardware machine check error occurred on the system
5 32 A bad page was discovered on the system
6 64 The user has asked that the system be marked "tainted". This
could be because they are running software that directly
modifies the hardware, or for other reasons
7 128 The system has died
8 256 The ACPI DSDT has been overridden with one supplied by the
user instead of using the one provided by the hardware
9 512 A kernel warning has occurred
10 1024 A module from drivers/staging was loaded
11 2048 The system is working around a severe firmware bug
12 4096 An out-of-tree module has been loaded
13 8192 An unsigned module has been loaded in a kernel supporting
module signature
14 16384 A soft lockup has previously occurred on the system
15 32768 The kernel has been live patched
For 12289 that works out to be....
[egreshko@meimei tainted]$ ./tainted
Taint value: 12289
[bit] [bit value] [description]
0 1 A module with a non-GPL license has been loaded, this
includes modules with no license.
Set by modutils >= 2.4.9 and module-init-tools
12 4096 An out-of-tree module has been loaded
13 8192 An unsigned module has been loaded in a kernel supporting
module signature
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
