On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us> wrote: > On 03/16/2015 04:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> That should get you more than one line. What's probably happening is >> there's an early "Not Tainted" line which is the one to file as a bug. > > > I don't have that for you yet (It's the laptop giving me trouble, and I > normally collect my email on my desktop.) but I do have this for you: > > Flags:GW > > https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/728180/ > > I don't know what that means, but a pointer in the right direction would be > greatly appreciated.
You're stubborn. Fortunately, I'm more stubborn. I've asked for a complete dmesg a couple of times and you keep giving snippets, so at this point I really ought to just ignore the requests for help. However... From your report: CPU: 0 PID: 871 Comm: Xorg Tainted: G W 3.18.5-101.fc20.i686+PAE #1 https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt 10: 'W' if a warning has previously been issued by the kernel. (Though some warnings may set more specific taint flags.) So there is a previous warning (or the kernel is very confused). There are a pile of bugs already reported on RHBR and kernel.org about this particular trace you've provided so it seems to be a known problem, likely a regression. But without a complete dmesg there's no way to know whether it's related to any problems you're having. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
