On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:56:34 +0100
Heinz Diehl <htd...@fritha.org> wrote:
> That's really complicated, baah :-)
>
It seems complicated, but with the screen template, it's almost habit.
I don't even have to think about it.
I tried the bfs patch on rc4 of the 4.0 kernel, but it got these errors:
kernel/sched/bfs.c:4811:50: error: redefinition of ‘io_schedule’
void __sched io_schedule(void)
^
In file included from include/linux/nmi.h:7:0,
from kernel/sched/bfs.c:33:
include/linux/sched.h:422:60: note: previous definition of
‘io_schedule’ was here static inline void io_schedule(void)
^
kernel/sched/bfs.c: In function ‘sched_domain_debug_one’:
kernel/sched/bfs.c:5695:2: error: implicit declaration of function
‘cpulist_scnprintf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cpulist_scnprintf(str, sizeof(str), sched_domain_span(sd)); ^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [kernel/sched/bfs.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [kernel/sched] Error 2
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
I'm currently running a compile on a vanilla 3.19 with the bfs and bfq
patches applied. If it doesn't have these errors, I can see if I get
the same behavior as you when compiling.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
