On 02/23/2015 05:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Right. And I'm still waiting to hear, what ought to be much easier
than answering your questions, examples of what layout the installer
won't let them create; or won't use once precreated elsewhere.

Fair enough.  For the record, I don't think it does bcache devices yet.

;-)

From a process and resource POV, though, it just seems like it would be
nice for anaconda development to be able to step off the hampster wheel
of chasing the lastest and greatest device types (and combinations
thereof).

If the bits are there in Fedora to support a particular storage setup,
let dracut, udev, etc. do their thing and just use the block devices
they set up.

--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher                                         arequip...@gmail.com
-------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" --------
========================================================================

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to