On Dec 17, 2014 3:10 PM, "Jim Lewis" <j...@jklewis.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 16, 2014 7:32 PM, "Jim Lewis" <j...@jklewis.com> wrote: > > > >> > > >> > >> Yes, when I couldn't find the full install DVD I settled for the > >> Mate-Compiz spin and have been configuring it for the last few days. I > >> now have to manually install a whole lot of packages that were just > >> there by default before. > >> > >> > >> Jim Lewis > >> > > > > Out of curiosity, what are you considering "the default" here? > > > > --Pete > > > > Hi Pete, > > Probably a poor choice of words on my part. "By default" to ME means > not having to install gcc, Java, LibreOffice, wget, strace, etc., and > fix things like Firefox associations (which I don't yet know how to > do). The installs of Fedora 1 through 14 made sense (didn't use 15 and > 16 because of Gnome 3). Versions 17-20 made sense as well. It's > possible the Fedora-Server-inst ISO would have been what I wanted if it > hadn't failed during the install. > > I just had some good luck. Installed the RPM Fusion files and have xmms > working with mp3 files. Now to see if Flash is going to work ... > > > Jim Lewis >
Okay, I thought it might be something like that :) There is of course no 'Jim' or 'Pete' package set on any install media, but I'll share a trick: use the `show-installed` utility. It can create a list of packages for you to feed to yum after install, or create a kickstart format for use during install. --Pete
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
