On Oct 20, 2014, at 9:42 PM, poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21.10.2014 03:26, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Oct 20, 2014, at 8:53 PM, poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 20.10.2014 17:14, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The bug is in grubby, which is what's called from within kernel packages >>>> to update bootloader configuration scripts: GRUB legacy, GRUB2, syslinux, >>>> yaboot, and probably a bunch of other bootloaders are all supported by >>>> grubby. It looks at the existing "old" kernel entry to use as a guide for >>>> inserting a new entry for the new kernel. It fails because it doesn't >>>> understand subvolumes. >>> >>> Are you sure it supports GRUB Legacy, 'cause in Rawhide after the kernel >>> upgrade there's no new entrance in /boot/grub/grub.conf. >> >> Bug? Grubby has supported grub legacy since the beginning as far as I know. >> Certainly going back to Fedora 12 at least. > > > "Bug" came from Miller, not from me. :) > Actually I don't mind GRUB Legacy isn't supported, config is quite simple, > the same as with the extlinux. > Why the GRUB(2) is used on BIOS machines, at all? I don't know why this crusty booger keeps coming up but the answer is that GRUB legacy is not maintained in 6+ years and no one wants to keep doing the work on it and Fedora need to be using current upstream packages. Upstream only supports GRUB2 to the point they call it GRUB, and if you ask GRUB legacy questions on any of their lists they tell you to upgrade, then re-ask the question. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
