On 15.10.2014 18:08, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:46:57 +0200 poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 15.10.2014 17:11, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:49:16 +0200 poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 15.10.2014 14:48, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:40:50 +0200 poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 15.10.2014 05:35, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my >>>>>>>>> dmesg also): >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ...... >>>>>>>>> [ 9.049204] systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+21 from PID 313 >>>>>>>>> (plymouthd). >>>>>>>>> [ 9.076954] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3 >>>>>>>>> [ 9.076955] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast >>>>>>>>> [ 9.076963] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized >>>>>>>>> [ 9.250563] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S >>>>>>>>> [ 9.253393] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S >>>>>>>>> [ 9.267833] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlp6s0: link is not ready >>>>>>>>> [ 9.402844] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 >>>>>>>>> [ 9.402847] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <m...@qualcomm.com> >>>>>>>>> [ 14.782008] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 >>>>>>>>> type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] >>>>>>>>> (20140724/nsarguments-95) >>>>>>>>> [ 14.782106] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP: failed to evaluate _DSM >>>>>>>>> [ 14.782110] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 >>>>>>>>> type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] >>>>>>>>> (20140724/nsarguments-95) >>>>>>>>> [ 18.485668] traps: pnmixer[1226] trap int3 ip:34d10504e9 >>>>>>>>> sp:7fffae324c50 error: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What does it mean? Is there a bug? If so, what should I file against? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> pnmixer does not come up, but it does come up when I type it >>>>>>>>> afterwards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Ranjan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.memtest.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, cryptic poma, what am I supposed to do with this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have memtest setup and have done it from boot: got the message "Pass: >>>>>>> Press ESC to exit" or something like that. So what do I do now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pray enlighten me! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ranjan >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Here, 5 passes without error. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your result? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have 8 passes without error. Says "Pass complete. No error detected: >>>>> Press ESC to exit" (I am relaying this message from memory -- the wording >>>>> may be a bit different, but not very.) >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK, where is the rest of the message, after "...traps: pnmixer ... error:"? >>> >>> Michael also asked this question, and there was nothing after that then! >>> That is where the messages ended. (This was upon a boot last night). And I >>> hibernated after that, but it did not come back up (rather came back up >>> with a non-working mouse -- clicks that would not do anything), so I had to >>> reboot. >>> >>> Here is the dmesg output (now): >>> >>> $ dmesg | fpaste >>> Uploading (91.9KiB)... >>> http://ur1.ca/idldg -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/142121/38568514 >>> >>> And here are lsmod: >>> >>> $ lsmod | fpaste >>> Uploading (5.3KiB)... >>> http://ur1.ca/idlde -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/142120/13385650 >>> maitra@bhagirathi 10:07:35~$ >>> >>> and >>> >>> $ lspci -v | fpaste >>> Uploading (8.6KiB)... >>> http://ur1.ca/idldm -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/142123/85718141 >>> >>> I have had a very good run with Fedora (from circa 2003, the days of FC1) >>> but this is the first time I am unable to get a machine working to my >>> satisfaction. (And it is not at all clear to me that the distribution has >>> much to do with it. These may be kernel issues, and I have submitted to >>> bugzilla both on Fedora and kernel.org but so far no >>> resolution/workaround.) This is a Dell Precision M3800. >>> >> >> >> Have you tried with this one? >> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/x86_64/ > > I have been trying this now: > > kernel-3.17.0-1.vanilla.mainline.knurd.1.fc20.x86_64 > > so that it helps in debugging for kernel.org. I was thinking of trying 3.17.1 > when it is released. From what I understood, the kernel with kernel.x86_64 > 3.18.0-0.rc0.git6.1.fc22 may well be the same. Prior to that, I tried: > > kernel-3.17.0-0.rc7.git3.1.fc22.x86_64 > kernel-3.17.0-0.rc7.git2.1.fc22.x86_64 > > from rawhide. >
:) kernel-3.18.0-0.rc0.git8.1.fc22 Completed Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:32:36 UTC http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=585364 kernel-3.17.0-0.rc7.git3.1.fc22 Completed Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:19:07 UTC http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=582519 https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log While you said the same, it has already passed. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
