On 12 Jul 2014 22:24:13 +0200 Anders Wegge Keller <we...@wegge.dk> wrote:
> > I'm not following your logic here. > > > > Given 2 ways of reacting to a bug: > > A) complain about it on a users mailing list that few developers > > follow. > > B) report a bug on it that developers will see and be able to > > respond to. > > C) Report a bug and be ignored, told to fsck off to someplace else, > and be ridiculed to boot. > > If you won't admit having seen option C on the bug tracker, I have no > need for your opinions. Sure, that happens sadly. ;( However, with a bug report (even if it's closed or not acted on): * If the package gets taken over by someone else, they can see the problem and look to fixing it. * Other interested parties can see the bug and add their data to it, note that it's still a problem, add workarounds, propose patches. * There's a solid record of the issue/reports. "look at bug 1234" is much better than "read 10,000 posts on the users list around june/july and try and find the actual bug report in the off topic stuff" * Even just adding yourself to the bug report can indicate that the problem is more widespread than the one user. Anyhow, if you don't want to file or add info to bugs, that's your decision. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
