On Jul 3, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Roman Kravets <ad...@softded.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:50:10PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> 
>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Roman Kravets <ad...@softded.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> [softded@softded ~]$ mount | grep xfs
>>> /dev/mapper/encrypt-store on /mnt/store type xfs 
>>> (rw,noatime,nodiratime,attr2,inode64,sunit=1024,swidth=2048,noquota)
>> 
>>> [softded@softded ~]$ xfs_info /dev/mapper/encrypt-store
>>> meta-data=/dev/mapper/encrypt-store isize=256    agcount=16, agsize=2440064 
>>> blks
>>>        =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=0
>>>        =                       crc=0
>>> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=39041024, imaxpct=25
>>>        =                       sunit=128    swidth=256 blks
>>> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
>>> log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=19064, version=2
>>>        =                       sectsz=512   sunit=8 blks, lazy-count=1
>>> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
>> 
>> 149GiB file system, is that correct?
>> Is this filesystem on hardware or software raid?
> 
> 
> Dear Chris,
> 
> Yes. It is correct.
> 
> I have software raid10 witch 4x80GB HDD.
> 
> I store on it raid my mail archive.

Ok well everything there looks normal. I'd still consider posting the 
experience to the XFS list, checking the XFS FAQ for the information to include 
in the submission. The fact you get this on fs mount and it inhibits a normal 
mount is pretty weird. It's not like it's a big file system either, but maybe 
it has something to do with 10 million files vs the size of the file system.


Chris Murphy
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to