Ian Malone writes:
On 20 May 2014 04:50, David Benfell <benf...@parts-unknown.org> wrote:But even so, unless you have a specialized need for Pulseaudio, which apparently may include very high-end audiophile applications, removing it seems generally harmless.High end audiophile applications like having more than one sound source running at a time?
I'm sorry. I can't answer this adequately. It's what came up the last time I saw this discussion.
Apparently, and I'm clearly not anywhere near enough of an audiophile to understand what they were going on about, pulseaudio does make some sound capabilities that matter a lot to musicians--which I think *did* include mixing--and other people who really care about extremely high fidelity sound. It was, for me, a jaw-dropping conversation that required me to acknowledge that as much as I think I care about high quality sound, I was completely out of my league.
I'd point you to the right list if I remembered which it was. And I think it'll be hard to find via Google because usually discussions about pulseaudio and its necessity devolve into flame wars.
-- David BenfellSee https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the attachment.
pgpSvqvW2bwh2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
