On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 20:33 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 20:17 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 20:04 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 May 2014 16:36:13 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm kind of at a loss here. I recently (yesterday, May 12) updated my > > > > > Fedora 20 laptop (originally a fresh install of F20 a couple of months > > > > > ago, no update from previous rev). I had previously updated it on > > > > > April > > > > > 30, less that 2 weeks ago. > > > > > > > yum history > > > > yum history undo … > > > > > > > > I get very similar results from liferea. Initial bitching seems to be > > > > > about Javascript and it ends with a java version, OpenJDK messages > > > > > and a > > > > > segfault and core dump. > > > > > > > JavaScript != Java > > > > > > Oh, I'm very aware of that fact. The fact remains that both remain in > > > common in the backtrace and the resulting error output that hurled > > > chunks. Just as there should be nothing in common between Evolution and > > > Liferea, there is something in common that seems to be causing this > > > problem. Determining the common factor is the problem. The fact that > > > neither seem to be updated seems to point to some deeper common factor, > > > which is far more disturbing. > > > > > > None of Liferea, Evolution, or OpenJDK were updated between April 30 > > > > > and > > > > > May 12. > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any idea what the hell has gone wrong here and what I > > > > > might > > > > > do to work around it?
> > > > Try reverting the last yum update via yum history undo. > > > > Then try to reproduce after repeating a yum update of individual > > > > packages. > > > Excellent suggestion. I'll proceed with that. > > Can't say this gives me a warm and fuzzy... > > Transaction Summary > > ================================================================================ > > Remove 4 Packages (+7 Dependent packages) > > Downgrade 39 Packages > > Not available 416 Packages > > > 416 packages not available. Not good. The revert history is a crap > > shoot and could make things worse. Trying it anyways. > > The good news... That got Evolution running and Liferea almost back to > normal but both are operational. > > The BAD news is something in those 39 downgraded packages is AFU and > causing this problem. Meaning, I can no longer upgrade till whatever it > is is fixed. Damn... > A subsequent "update" is saying "90 packages to upgrade". Damn. > Needless to say, that was a test run to which I said "HELL NO". It appears that I am, once again fully function on both applications with both previous profiles prior to the recent update fuck up. I still have no idea, out of the 39 packages downgraded did the damage. Makes it a little tough to post buzilla ticket. But, I'm a systems developer. Why am I not surprised. Many thanks to the feedback. It was IMMESNSLY valuable and reaffirmed my recourse to refferring to this list, I thank you all... Regards, Mike -- Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
