On 03/25/2014 12:10 PM, Powell, Michael wrote:
I disagree; if a user is presented with the following filesystem choices, 
btrfs, ext2, ext3, ext4, JFS, reiser4, reiserFS, and ZFS, and each is presented 
equally with a single paragraph describing its benefits, unless the user has 
prior knowledge about what is the best choice for the intended installation 
goal, they're most likely going to spend a great deal of time reading each 
paragraph. If you simplify the choices to 4 instead of 8, the user has less 
paragraphs to read and can make a decision faster.

Agreed. However, it might be a good compromise to list only the most common selections, with a button marked Advanced Options (There's probably a better label, but if so, I can't think of it right now.) containing the rest. Beginners will, most likely, avoid that, but those who need/want the more specialized file systems will still have access to them.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to