Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> writes: > On Mar 24, 2014, at 6:45 AM, lee <l...@yun.yagibdah.de> wrote: >> >> /usr belongs on it`s own partition. > > As if no one has ever said that before, and as if it convinced even one > thinking person to change their mind.
Thinking persons do not need to change their minds about it because they realise that being able to have /usr on it`s own partition is a good thing. > Fedora has never defaulted to separate /usr partition. It's been two > years since this was decided. That you're still experiencing cognitive > dissonance over this ancient long ago resolve topic is your problem, > not anyone else's. I am not experiencing cognitive dissonance, and it`s not my fault when Fedora made a retarded decision before I even started using it. This discussion is about Fedora.next, and it might be possible to fix the problem in some future version of Fedora. >> And last time I looked, it would >> not be compliant with the FHS not to have what is needed in /bin and >> /sbin but to use symlinks instead. > > bin lib lib64 are symlinks to their locations in /usr. And that is supposed to be a good thing? -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
