Hi
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > is that considered good package design? it may be that there are > some packages that absolutely need some webserver feature that is > provided only by httpd, but is it also possible that some packages are > being unnecessarily restrictive? just trying to understand the > packaging philosophy here. > It is likely that packages that are specifically depending on httpd as opposed to just webserver are following older guidelines and haven't been updated. You should consider filing bug reports Rahul
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
