-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2014 03:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:26:03 -0600 Steven Stern > <subscribed-li...@sterndata.com> wrote: > >> From the CENTOS user mailing list >> >> > <snipped> Would this be a ready made base, for fedora.next server? >
I can only speak for my own intentions here, but I have been treating Fedora Server as the reverse. What I want to see is Fedora Server being the development line for what will eventually become the RHEL Server and CentOS Server platforms. Ideally, I'd like to do it without the historic "wink wink, RHEL might be coming soon" garbage that makes it difficult to plan. I'd like for there to be transparency about exactly we expect RHEL N+1 to be providing and make a clear and publicized branch point from Fedora Server. So, in effect, CentOS basically does then become the Fedora LTS that people have been asking for over the years. Note: This statement is made by Stephen Gallagher the Fedora contributor. Stephen Gallagher the Red Hat employee is campaigning for this internally as well, but no commitments (or contradictions) have as yet been made by Red Hat towards this statement. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLNREIACgkQeiVVYja6o6PvXACfQGPj7EWJzr5UEt9g8KR+lbRs 23UAn1LpiBOWFhua71YU19ts6emPTxnO =UrLH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
