On 01/03/2014 08:53 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote: > On 01/03/2014 03:47 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: >> This is a Fedora-20 64 bit XFCE system. >> >> Only once has this produced an update for me: >> >> [root@box10 bobg]# dnf update >> Resolving dependencies >> --> Starting dependency resolution >> --> Finished dependency resolution >> Dependencies resolved. >> Nothing to do. >> >> But yum update a moment later: >> >> Transaction Summary >> ========================================================================================================================================================================================= >> >> >> Install 2 Packages >> Upgrade 23 Packages >> >> Total download size: 45 M >> Is this ok [y/d/N]: y >> >> And it went through to complete this morning's update. >> >> What is wrong? DNF man page shows an update command ,,, >> >> Bob >> > > Hey Bob, > > that's expected: > > http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/02/dnf-update-and-yum-update-produce-different-output/ > > Ales
That seems counterproductive. If there are updates to be had then dnf needs to find them and apply them. Blaming metadata timing to result in no updates is a dodge and needs to be corrected. If not seeing available updates is not considered "a real update problem" then what is? Yet another place where dnf will need to improve before becoming a yum replacement. Kevin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
