On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > > So that's consistent with what you're seeing I think. I got sick of the > user@0.service bug causing delays and formed the habit of using virsh > destroy. Looks like a totally separate bug here.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044145 I think I figured it out. This is some GUI confusion. The option is Shut Down, but due to how the VM is launched, the -no-shutdown option is used by default, which makes the shut down command a pmsuspend command instead. This may end up turning into notabug. But I think it's sufficient confusing that at least the term used should be re-evaluated. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
