On Dec 8, 2013, at 7:20 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> But also unfortunate timing, in that there haven't been significantly better > alternatives to FAT32 that address resilience, volume size, and file size > limitations. Oops, other than NTFS. I don't know what the licensing terms are for NTFS vs exFAT, maybe there's some meaningful difference. But I wonder why so many media devices fall for paying for exFAT, which has significantly less resilience than FAT32, when NTFS is a viable cross platform option. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
