Am 21.10.2013 00:03, schrieb Alchemist: > 2013/10/21 Doug <dmcgarr...@optonline.net <mailto:dmcgarr...@optonline.net>> > > On 10/20/2013 05:36 PM, Fred Erickson wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:45:05 +0000 (UTC) > > Beartooth <bearto...@comcast.net <mailto:bearto...@comcast.net>> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:36:01 +0100, John Horne wrote: > >> > >>> rpm -qa | wc -l > >> > >> Thanks! That told me 2377; does this number seem plausible? > >> > > > > [fred@athbox-f18 ~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l > > 2351 > > [fred@athbox-f18 ~]$ uname -r > > 3.11.4-101.fc18.x86_64 > > > > Note: I have developer packages and 3 desktops are installed. > > > I don't know what this is counting--I must have missed the first post. > Anyway, I ran it in my pclos-kde-32, and go this: > > [doug@linux1 ~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l > 2352 > > So what is it that I have 2352 of? > > --doug > > > grep out fc19 or fc18 or so Fedora N versions, for possible dublicates (in > that case, next step package-cleanup) > rpm -qa | grep fcN | wc -l
why in the next step? this is a completly wrong advise, there maybe F18/F19 packages which are *not* dupes and so the grep shows nothing with value "package-cleanup --dupes" is your friend as well as "package-cleanup --cleandupes"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
