On 18.07.2013 01:03, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: > poma wrote: >> On 17.07.2013 23:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: >> >>> … Or, maybe >>> there is/are other programs, better/more suitable for this? >> >> http://www.digikam.org/ >> >> poma > > You recommend skip over F19+ and jump directly to windows? IMO it is > unacceptable, they are horrible reactionaries and do not merits > such happiness.
A little bumped with the advertisement on the front page, aren't you Fran. :) Since you mention it, http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?nodetect http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/all.html Boogeyman, aren't they. :) > Or, when You recommend 'digikam' SW, what are benefits for this > election? > Digikam is Qt/KDE based, thus I'd rather see some GTK based piece of > SW (but not insist upon this - I'm using Xfce and MATE and using k3b > instead of not so powerfull GTK alternatives). > Could You offer/refer to some comparison digikam x gThumb x shotwell? If the desktop environment is what is most important to you, not the application itself, go ahead, knock yourself. digiKam speaks for itself. Besides you didn't even mention the type of camera in question. poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
