Allegedly, on or about 17 June 2013, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. sent: > I guess I'll have to ditch my SAMBA 3 whitepapers and look into > the NFS thingie some more!
Always explore the options. > And I assume the NFS has "workable" access and file permissioning? Linux box to Linux box, it works virtually the same as using a local hard drive. I can't remember about Windows to Linux (it was long ago). Samba, when you use some of the extensions can do apparently native Linux to Linux behaviour, but I found it far more convoluted than using NFS. NFS has security implications, and it's not without reason it got known as no f*g security. Samba also has security implications, especially when people set it up to have none (the same people who drop firewalls, turn off SELinux, have everything world writeable...). > Hmm....still don't know why everyone thinks Windows is the best and > brightest?!.... Brainwashing... Or, given no choice, they just go with the flow. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.8.13-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 13 13:36:17 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
