On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:22:10 -0700 "T.C. Hollingsworth" <tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার > <ana...@samaddar.co.uk> wrote: > > On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:07:15 +0100 > > আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar <ana...@samaddar.co.uk> wrote: > >> I tested the port on ShieldsUP and it informs me that it is > >> 'stealth' mode so obviously not open. I don't think the router is > >> the problem as when I disabled the firewall the port was shown as > >> being open. I'll give Deluge a shot. > >> > >> Ananda > > > > No joy with Deluge using the same port. When firewalld is active > > the port is closed. When it's disabled the port is shown as open > > in Deluge. > > Well I didn't expect Deluge to magically open the port, only to do a > better job at reporting its open status. ;-) > > Are you completely sure your interface is in the "public" zone? > `firewall-cmd --get-active-zones` should tell you whether that is the > case. > > If it is, I would suspect that firewalld doesn't work very well with > the network service. You might have to use the old iptables service > instead. (I'd suggest filing a bug against firewalld to let them know > this is broken, though.) > > -T.C. I'm using upnp (I know, I know). Once I opened tcp port 5000 for upnp in the firewall it magically worked. The port is now shown as open and I tested a torrent download. It went along swimmingly. It looks like it may be potentially solved. thanks, Ananda -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
