On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> > Yes. It assumes that low latency equals high throughput, which is not > always the case (in fact it is often not true). Now, mirrormanager > should be pointing you to a regional mirror to start with, so you should > probably check that (there could be a bad mirror listed or something > like that). Well, down here in .ar you get MUCH better bandwidth (usually what you pay for) for LOCAL connections (*.ar) while you get, if you're lucky 60% of the paid bandwidth for international connections (with some exceptions, ie Google, Youtube, which have local servers-caching of some sort), due to all the traffic shaping and bandwidth limit rules applied to international connections. For me, yum-fastestmirror works WONDERFUL. Here's the output of installing gparted in 12 secs http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=Tv8CVHgX vs 34 seconds without yum-fastestmirror http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=rBkVpCDv Of course for a small package like gparted it's no big deal, but you see the speeds are 3x better with yum-fastestmirror, and it suddenly turns into a lot of time when installing big packages... So, I don't know about what approach it uses, but it works for me. If you think the current measurements by yum-fastestmirror is broken in some instances, it's an opportunity to improve the algorithms (ie measuring the speed of retrieving updates/primary_db the first time it is run, from the nearest servers, first by domain name / country code and then geographically? (ie neighboring countries) FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
