On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 13:01 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:22:20PM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > explicit warning about it not checking the current state of the kernel > > > > rules before overwriting them. Presumably firewall-config is more > > > > careful. No-one is saying you can't write your own scripts, but the OP > > > Presumably it's more careful how? > > Well, the tool could check if the rules have been changed behind its > > back before overwriting them. Not a complete solution without interlocks > > of course, but still. > > I'm saying it currently doesn't do that. > > > I've no idea if it actually does this. The "presumably" comes from the > > absence of a warning about it, a warning which is present in the old > > tool. Are you saying the risk is still there, but the warning isn't? > > I guess I am. :)
Worth knowing I guess. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
