Eddie O'Connor wrote:
Sorry....I was under the impression that you never "named" another distro on a
different mailing list....the distro is Red Hat Enterprise Linux......I
downloaded the ISO from a mirror site and assumed it would install just like
Scientific /CEntOS.....but its totally different....I guess if the only way to
get it to work is to sign up for the RHN support I might have to just let it
go....
On Feb 1, 2013 2:05 PM, "Bill Davidsen" <david...@tmr.com
<mailto:david...@tmr.com>> wrote:
[...snip...]
This is silly, without the distro name we would be guessing. And if their
support list is exclusionary to that extent, is this really a direction you
want to go?
No, you can use CentOS or Scientific Linux to run the code without violating the
license. For personal use, or on a single system, there's little to choose
between them, CentOS is better known, SL is the software support group for the
SuperCollider, has a few tweaks useful if you want your own version of something
on a few machines of many, and still want updates to work. I type this on a
SL-6.x running in a VM, nice setup to avoid cost of porting from FC6 to current
tech.
--
Bill Davidsen <david...@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
