Am 05.11.2012 21:38, schrieb Bill Davidsen: > If it were a new version of something else, wouldn't it just be pushed off to > the next release? Other things have > been put off, sometimes amid great outcry from those wanting the latest. Why > is anaconda being forced in now, when > it will undoubtedly still have warts when it is declared "working" and would > benefit from a delay to fc19.
this is ecactly my main criticism in releses past F14 features with a large impact are approved way too soon in the hope they will become ready until release date and included all over the distribution in a way that it is impossible to delay them to the next release IMHO the largest benefit of opensource instead marketing driven commercial products is that there is no reason for more or less carfeul chnages with large impact especially in a distribution with a release every 6 months - hey if something is not ready it would take only few months to get it out if it would be delayed to the next release IMHO "featres" should be approved and included only if they are in a more or less ready state and not in a "sometimes in the future state" delay them would make the whole delevopment / QA for many people much easier if you keep in mind that impact on many other peackages means work and testing for a large account of maintainers / contributors and it is hardly possible to have a good QA if integration starts very late in the release cycle because the pieces are not ready for it
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
