Alan Cox <a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> What really matters is whether the drive itself thinks on its smart test
> whether it is likely to be failing not some joke heuristic.
And even then, if the 5-year old Google numbers are still valid, you have
a 1/3 chance of being surprised.
"The Google team found that 36% of the failed drives did not exhibit
a single SMART-monitored failure. They concluded that SMART data is
almost useless for predicting the failure of a single drive."
ref: http://storagemojo.com/2007/02/19/googles-disk-failure-experience/
-wolfgang
--
g+: https://plus.google.com/114566345864337108516/about
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
