On 13Aug2012 23:04, Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> wrote: | On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:24:56AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: | > | How do I say, run that command on the current message (or pipe it) | > | inside the macro definition? | > | > Use <pipe-message> to send the message to a script which writes a mutt | > command, and then source the resulting file. | | Do you mean something like this: | | "<pipe-message> <shell-cmd> > <tmp-file>; source <tmp-file>"
No, it looks like you're using the shell's "source" command. I imagine you want mutt doing the sourcing, since you will be writing mutt commands to the file. Something like: <pipe-message> shell-command >tempfile <enter> <enter-command>source tempfile<enter> I would have "shell-command" invoke a script of your own; that way it is easy to modify and your macro is simple. | > Also consider joining the mutt-users list; plenty of mutters there. | Thanks for reminding me, I will do that soon. Not that I have any objection to extra mutt advertising here, but your issues are mutt specific, not fedora specific... Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> Anarchy may not be the best form of government, but it's better than no government at all. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
