On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us> wrote:
> On 07/07/2012 03:21 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
>>
>> I am more worried about "free" as in freedom. I don't quite grasp the
>> implications as an end user. For example consider the following
>> scenarios.
>
>
> Didn't we hash this out less than a month ago? I know you've been on the
> list long enough to have seen it and participated. Why bring it up again?
>
Well, I did follow that thread and the noise level was rather high to
extract the practical details. For example, I wasn't sure if the disable
secure boot option was mandated by MS or not. Given the option, I'll
disable it for sure but I wasn't sure if I would have the option to
disable. Hence all my questions were with regards to how I can run my
system given secure boot is enabled.
The following comment from Rahul answers my question.
> On x86 systems, the ability to disable secure boot is mandated by
> Microsoft and needed to debug Microsoft drivers ...
And for the record, I did not start the thread. I just asked a question
in the context of the thread. I hope that clears up any doubts.
PS: If you are wondering, what I took from the thread, it's going to be
a pain if at some point the optional requirement to secure boot is
removed.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
