> Amazing. Not in a good way. > The corruption would be at the client end, correct? > Is there a reason that the client could not just report back > "taking to long to mount" and leave its data uncorrupted? > > Would similar corruption take place if the process had just > termintated itself without waiting for NFS to succeed?
With properly written apps NFS soft and intr etc are all fine. The problem is that a lot of apps are badly written and don't check for short writes to disk or for close() erroring. Same apps that break on disk full. Alan -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
