On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:59:29PM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I've always tried to make sure everything is lowest common
> denominator between Microsoft and Linux unless there is a good
> reason. I learned the hard way the first time I had to port from
> Linux to Microsoft. I really dislike anything on my computers having
> kittens.
Heh. Unfortunately, if we're using a Linux box as server host for a
bunch'o Win boxen, we'll get the Windows directory paths inside the shares.
*Shrug*. It's the nature of the beast.
> I think part of it was a dislike for style / syntax of scripting /
> shells. ...
> ...
> ...I was brought up with programming languages
> and assembler/machine, they defined my taste in tailors ...
Well, remember the Bourne shell--the origin for sh, bash, etc.--was written
to be ALGOL 68. So it's a programming language...
An interesting little ditty, if you don't know it. Steve Bourne really
loved ALGOL. So much so that he wrote the original shell *in* ALGOL...kind
of. It was ostensibly 'C'...but he created an entire set of #defines to
allow him to actually write the shell in ALGOL.
When I heard this, I said, "Naw...". When I actually got to work at Bell
Labs around 1980, and got access to the Unix source code, one of the first
things I did was check the source. Yes, he did.
This also explains why the original shell remained static for so long--it
was a hellish mess; nobody wanted to be responsible for trying to change it.
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
dih...@dminet.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
