On 10/16/2011 01:56 PM, agraham wrote: > > The real problem here is the designers of the concept lost sight of the > actual benefit to the user, the problem as I would state is: > > "Provide a means that allows consistent naming of network devices". > > That should have translated into eth0 is "ALWAYS" the first device, eth1 > is "ALWAYS" the second device etc.. the biosdevname should have then > been used to create that relationship and _nothing else_.
Do read the feature description and related discussions. It's not like you are the first person to think of this. Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
