Thank you, I was able to install 1.2.9 from the testing repo. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> ** > On 08/05/2011 12:36 PM, Aaron Hagopian wrote: > > Rich, > > Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1 x86_64 and > getting: > > $ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit > Setting up Install Process > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package 389-ds-base.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed > --> Processing Dependency: 389-ds-base-libs = 1.2.8.3-1.el6 for package: > 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libslapd.so.0()(64bit) for package: > 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64 > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed > --> Processing Conflict: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64 conflicts > selinux-policy-base < 3.9.7-11 > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: 389-ds-base conflicts with selinux-policy-targeted > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem > You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest > > > Installed Packages > Name : selinux-policy-targeted > Arch : noarch > Version : 3.7.19 > Release : 93.el6_1.2 > Size : 2.8 M > Repo : installed > From repo : sl-security > Summary : SELinux targeted base policy > URL : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/ > License : GPLv2+ > Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base module. > > My selinux policy too new? > > No. The problem is that 1.2.8.3 doesn't work. Try the latest 1.2.9.x from > the testing repo. > > > Thanks, > Aaron Hagopian > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com>wrote: > >> On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote: >> > On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmegg...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote: >> >>> Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean >> >>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to >> >>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in >> >>> this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version? >> >> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version. We >> will >> >> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL. >> > Would this include multi-master, as it is now or another implementation? >> Yes. The separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL and RHDS >> customers. >> > Thanks again, >> > >> > --Amos >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> > > > -- > 389 users mailing > list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > >
-- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
