On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > ... > >> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex. >> Before getting into specific issues that can cause this... >> > > If you intend to use POSIX ACLs with NFSv4 forget about it, because user > umask is always applied at the client side over the default POSIX ACLs > making difficult to have for example rw directory/files for some group > of users.
That is part of what I am trying to discover by asking him for the output I wrote and more about the authentication/authorization situation on the network. There are a large number of reasons permissions can get kajiggered over the network with NFSv4 or AFS, and in an office environment doubly so because of the prevalence of LDAP, NIS and Kerberos deployments, along with SELinux fun tossed in. -Iwao -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines