On 04/21/2011 08:53 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
Have you determined how to handle the EPEL issue for RHEL 6? Are you going to rename the 389-ds rpms in EPEL? Setup a new repository?
Still don't know. Problem with renaming 389-ds rpms is that it may break packages that depend on 389 like freeipa and dogtag. Open to suggestions.

Thanks,
Aaron


On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    On 04/21/2011 02:26 AM, Steven Jones wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > Are these bog std 389 in rhel 6 though? the reason I ask is
    there is also the free-ipa packages which seems to use parts of
    389.....so Im wondering if there is any compile/build differences
    for the 389 stuff in RHEL6 to suit free ipa....which may mean the
    official rhel packages are best avoided if doing FDS.
    The 389-ds-base 1.2.8.x in RHEL 6.1 is almost identical to 1.2.8.x in
    Fedora/epel5 except
    * the one in RHEL only has critical bug fixes from now on - the one in
    Fedora/epel5 may have additional non-critical bug fixes (but no new
    functionality in the 1.2.8 branch)
    * the one in RHEL does not have replication/winsync in the core
    package
    - it is available in an additional package ds-replication
    > regards
    >
    > Steven
    > ________________________________________
    > From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    [389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org>] on behalf of
    Rich Megginson [rmegg...@redhat.com <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>]
    > Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2011 4:36 a.m.
    > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
    > Subject: Re: [389-users] 389 ds packages for EL6?
    >
    > On 04/19/2011 10:21 AM, Rupert Kolb wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> are there rpm packages to install 386 Directory Server at EL6?
    >> (I found packages for EL5 only)
    > 389-ds-base is in the RHEL 6.1 beta
    >> Thanks
    >> Rupert Kolb
    >> --
    >> 389 users mailing list
    >> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
    > --
    > 389 users mailing list
    > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
    > --
    > 389 users mailing list
    > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

    --
    389 users mailing list
    389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users



--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to