I have install redhat-rpm-config, and I didn't see separate pkg. Separating debuginfo will make it run much faster?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote: > GeeKer Wang wrote: > > > Hi, guys > > I tried to compile OpenSceneGraph-2.8.3-3.fc14.rpm software, and got > a > > low efficient and large version of it. But the version from fedora-repo > > works well. > > eg. my version with frame rate < 10, while fedora-repo version with frame > > rate ~=40. > > > > I have tried three ways: > > 1. configure && make > > 2. ccmake && make > > 3. rpmbuild --recompile OpenSceneGraph-2.8.3-3.fc14.src.rpm > > They resulted the same anyway. Especially, the rpmbuld way took 3G+ disk > > space, each .so file is much larger and each application is slower. It's > > realy strange to me. I use the gcc/g++ 4.5.1 under fedora 14. > > > > So where the differences come from? Or where are the special places in > > fedora's compiling environment? Any advice will be appreciated, thx. > > 3 is the way to go, I'd venture you didn't have redhat-rpm-config > installed, > so it used slightly different compiler flags and didn't generate a separate > -debuginfo pkg (ie, why it was so much bigger). > > -- Rex > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
