On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Mike Wohlgemuth <m...@woogie.net> wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 01:37 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Bruno Wolff III<br...@wolff.to> wrote: > >> If you distribute binaries, you need to make source code available as > well. > >> There are a few ways to do that and you want to make sure you are doing > at > >> least one of them. > > The source code is already provided by the distro distributed. A VM is > > just a repackaging of the distro, in its installed form. > > While your statement might sound reasonable on the surface, I do not > believe it actually complies with the GPL. As a distributor of GPLd > software, you are responsible for providing the source. The fact that > the source is available elsewhere does not absolve you of the > responsibility, just like the source being available for RHEL does not > absolve the CentOS project from needing to provide the source they use > to build the CentOS binaries. > If someone asks, I will provide the source. I don´t believe anywhere in the GPL it makes the explicit requirement to upload the sources to a public web server. FC > > Woogie > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- "It begins with a blessing And it ends with a curse; Making life easy, By making it worse;" -- Kevin Ayers
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
