Wendt, Trevor wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Thanks Edward, turning off syntaxchecking in 
> /etc/dirsrv/slapd-ldapprod1/dse.ldif allowed me to do an ldif2db import 
> successfully.
>
> Thanks Rich, I then ran the /usr/sbin/setup-ds.pl -u to make sure everything 
> was good and ran the verify-db.pl script also.
>
> Question: Is it now safe to turn back on the syntaxchecking or should I leave 
> it off?
>   
It's better to run with syntax checking on.  You can use the 
syntax-validate.pl script 
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html/Configuration_and_Command-Line_Tool_Reference/Perl_Scripts.html#syntax-validate.pl
 
to check to see what data problems you might have.  If you have too many 
problems, just run with syntax-checking off until you can fix them.
> Appreciate the help!
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 11:14 AM
> To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [389-users] Migration Assistance Fedora-DS 1.04 to 389-ds 1.2.6
>
> Wendt, Trevor wrote:
>   
>> Hello. I need some help with migrating a Fedora-Directory/1.0.4
>> B2006.312.1539 to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.6-1.el5 from epel.
>> Running on RHEL 5 (Linux 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5PAE #1 SMP Tue Feb 19
>> 07:32:39 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux).
>>
>>
>>
>> The new 389-ds will be on the same server as the current fedora-ds so
>> I have tried using migrate-ds-admin.pl script as well as doing the
>> ldif export/import for cross platform migrations. Regardless of the
>> method, I eventually hit the following error.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>> [29/Sep/2010:17:39:12 -0600] attr_syntax_create - Error: the EQUALITY
>> matching rule [caseIgnoreIA5Match] is not compatible with the syntax
>> [1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15] for the attribute [dc]
>>
>>
>>
>> [29/Sep/2010:17:39:12 -0600] attr_syntax_create - Error: the SUBSTR
>> matching rule [caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch] is not compatible with
>> the syntax [1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15] for the attribute [dc]
>>
>>
>>
>> [29/Sep/2010:17:39:12 -0600] dse - The entry cn=schema in file
>> /etc/dirsrv/slapd-bhc/schema/60mozilla.ldif is invalid, error code 20
>> (Type or value exists) - attribute type nsAIMid: Does not match the
>> OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.13769.2.4". Another attribute type is already using
>> the name or OID.
>>
>>
>>
>> [29/Sep/2010:17:39:12 -0600] dse - Please edit the file to correct the
>> reported problems and then restart the server.
>>
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> The Fedora install is an out of the box installation with a
>> master/consumer configuration. I read somewhere that removing the old
>> ldif file from my fedora-ds scheme folder may clear the error but no
>> way to know which one may be conflicting wit the new 60mozilla.ldif file.
>>
>>
>>
>> In my old fedora-ds/<instance_name>/config/scheme folder are the
>> following:
>>
>> 00core.ldif
>>
>> 05rfc2247.ldif
>>
>> 05rfc2927.ldif
>>
>> 10presence.ldif
>>
>> 10rfc2307.ldif
>>
>> 20subscriber.ldif
>>
>> 25java-object.ldif
>>
>> 28pilot.ldif
>>
>> 30ns-common.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-admin.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-calendar.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-certificate.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-compass.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-delegated-admin.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-directory.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-legacy.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-mail.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-mcd-browser.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-mcd-config.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-mcd-li.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-mcd-mail.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-media.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-mlm.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-msg.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-netshare.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-news.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-proxy.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-value.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-wcal.ldif
>>
>> 50ns-web.ldif
>>
>> 51ns-calendar.ldif
>>
>> 60pam-plugin.ldif
>>
>> 99user.ldif
>>
>>
>>
>> Any suggestions on what I need to do to get around this error?
>>
>>     
> After migration, try running setup-ds.pl -u
>   
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This electronic message transmission contains information from Black
>> Hills Corporation, its affiliate or subsidiary, which may be
>> confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the
>> use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, be aware the disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received
>> this electronic transmission in error, please reply to sender
>> immediately; then delete this message without copying it or further
>> reading.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>     
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> This electronic message transmission contains information from Black Hills 
> Corporation, its affiliate or subsidiary, which may be confidential or 
> privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual 
> or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware the 
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information 
> is prohibited. If you received this electronic transmission in error, please 
> reply to sender immediately; then delete this message without copying it or 
> further reading.
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>   

--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to