On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:35:14 +0000 (UTC) JB <jb.1234a...@gmail.com> wrote:
...snip... > This is my idea of the new security concept: > - it should be real-time (operating in a background) > - it should be modular in the sense of traditional small, single > function, and stand-alone UNIX utilities > - it has to be simple to be acceptable and understandable by all sys > admins and users of UNIX/Linux systems > - it should be configurable: > - by sys admin and user (selectively) > - at any time > - dynamically > - it should show various diagnostics (alarms) in real-time, but never > interfere with or prevent a program from execution. > At least that should be a default behavior. > - it should not interfere with / try to undo any present and standard > UNIX/Linux system security measures > - it should be supplementary to existing UNIX/Linux system security > - it should be self-contained, installable and removable at any time, > without influencing the system > > I am sure others will add to and extend it, but in the spirit of > improvement. JB Feel free to start a new project, develop it and then ask for buy in from distros. Until you have something that is better, calling for the removal of selinux is a non starter. ;) I would suggest that this list is not the place to develop a new security framework. There's any number of free software project sites out there you can use to setup your community. Good luck! kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
